# LubeLogger vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

LubeLogger scores 65/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-urbit