# LubeLogger vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 78 729 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +2 005 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 005 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-unsloth