# LubeLogger vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 65 400 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +445 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Traefik needs more configuration.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+445 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-traefik