# LubeLogger vs tidb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | tidb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #4 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 40 685 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for tidb.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-tidb