# LubeLogger vs teslamateapi

> Two self-hosted [Vehicle Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/vehicle-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | teslamateapi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 924 ✓ | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

LubeLogger scores 65/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for teslamateapi.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; teslamateapi needs more configuration.

LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+68 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [teslamateapi](https://selfhost.directory/project/teslamateapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teslamateapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-teslamateapi