# LubeLogger vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 13 312 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-stash