# LubeLogger vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 45 678 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +839 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-sentry