# LubeLogger vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-sdnext