# LubeLogger vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 61 542 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +498 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-pi-hole