# LubeLogger vs OpenSearch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | OpenSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #7 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 13 932 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2.19.7 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenSearch scores 76/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for OpenSearch.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; OpenSearch needs more configuration.

OpenSearch is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [OpenSearch](https://selfhost.directory/project/opensearch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opensearch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-opensearch