# LubeLogger vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 65 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +313 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-nocodb