# LubeLogger vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 20 542 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +290 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+290 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-mediamtx