# Luanti vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Luanti | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 13 789 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.17.0 · 20 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Luanti scores 77/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Luanti ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Luanti is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Luanti](https://selfhost.directory/project/luanti) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/luanti.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/luanti-vs-zammad