LuantivsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Luanti | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Game Servers | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 13 789 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.17.0 · 20 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Luanti scores 77/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Luanti ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Luanti is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Luanti details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Luanti, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with