LuantivsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Luanti | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Game Servers | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 13 784 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.17.0 · 20 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Luanti scores 77/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Luanti ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Luanti needs more configuration.
Luanti is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
Luanti details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →