LuantivsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Luanti | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Game Servers | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 13 782 | 27 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +54 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 20 |
| Latest release | 5.17.0 · 20 Aug 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 77/100 for Luanti, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Luanti.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Luanti needs more configuration.
Luanti is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
Luanti details →PostgREST details →