# lua.sh vs OpenShort.link

> Two self-hosted [Bitly alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/bitly), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | lua.sh | OpenShort.link |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in URL Shortener | #3 of 6 in Web Application |
| GitHub stars | 342 ✓ | 113 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.11.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

lua.sh scores 50/100 against 45/100 for OpenShort.link, so it is the safer default.

OpenShort.link ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lua.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenShort.link is easier to run; lua.sh needs more configuration.

OpenShort.link is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [lua.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/lua) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lua.md)
- [OpenShort.link](https://selfhost.directory/project/openshortlink) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openshortlink.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lua-vs-openshortlink