# Loomio vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Loomio | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 2 622 | 24 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.13.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 64/100 for Loomio, so it is the safer default.

Loomio ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Loomio is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Loomio](https://selfhost.directory/project/loomio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loomio.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loomio-vs-temporal