# LoomFlow vs suna

> Two self-hosted [n8n alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/n8n), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LoomFlow | suna |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in AI Workflows | #25 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 136 | 20 327 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 150 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.11 · 2 Sept 2026 | v0.14.8 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

suna scores 71/100 against 44/100 for LoomFlow, so it is the safer default.

suna ships more often: 150 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for LoomFlow.

If you want the quickest setup, LoomFlow is easier to run; suna needs more configuration.

suna is growing faster right now (+94 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LoomFlow](https://selfhost.directory/project/loomflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loomflow.md)
- [suna](https://selfhost.directory/project/suna) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/suna.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loomflow-vs-suna