Grafana LokivsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grafana Loki | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 29 087 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Grafana Loki is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
Grafana Loki details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Grafana Loki, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with