# Grafana Loki vs Wastebin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grafana Loki | Wastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 29 087 ✓ | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.

Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.

If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Grafana Loki needs more configuration.

Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grafana Loki](https://selfhost.directory/project/loki) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loki.md)
- [Wastebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loki-vs-wastebin