Grafana LokivsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grafana Loki | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 29 087 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Grafana Loki needs more configuration.
Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
Grafana Loki details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Grafana Loki, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with