# Grafana Loki vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grafana Loki | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 29 087 ✓ | 1 505 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +144 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for usque.

Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+144 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grafana Loki](https://selfhost.directory/project/loki) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loki.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loki-vs-usque