# Grafana Loki vs Standard Notes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grafana Loki | Standard Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 29 090 ✓ | 6 686 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.

Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.

If you want the quickest setup, Grafana Loki is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.

Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grafana Loki](https://selfhost.directory/project/loki) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loki.md)
- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loki-vs-standard-notes