# Grafana Loki vs SnapOtter

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grafana Loki | SnapOtter |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #3 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 29 085 ✓ | 2 871 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.2.0 · 29 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 66/100 for SnapOtter, so it is the safer default.

Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SnapOtter.

If you want the quickest setup, SnapOtter is easier to run; Grafana Loki needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Grafana Loki](https://selfhost.directory/project/loki) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loki.md)
- [SnapOtter](https://selfhost.directory/project/snapotter) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snapotter.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loki-vs-snapotter