# Grafana Loki vs OpenBrief

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grafana Loki | OpenBrief |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 29 093 ✓ | 580 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.

Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; Grafana Loki needs more configuration.

Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grafana Loki](https://selfhost.directory/project/loki) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/loki.md)
- [OpenBrief](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/loki-vs-openbrief