logstashvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logstash | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 14 969 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 10 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 72/100 for logstash, so it is the safer default.
logstash ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; logstash needs more configuration.
logstash details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep logstash, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with