logforgevsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logforge | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 302 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | — |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.
logforge ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.
If you want the quickest setup, logforge is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
logforge details →Shinobi details →
Swap a project
Keep logforge, compare it with
Keep Shinobi, compare it with