logforgevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logforge | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 302 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 28 |
| Latest release | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for logforge.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
logforge details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep logforge, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with