logforgevsPortainer
Two self-hosted Container Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logforge | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 302 | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 21 |
| Latest release | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Zlib |
| Main language | — | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for logforge.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; logforge needs more configuration.
Portainer is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).
logforge details →Portainer details →All Container Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep logforge, compare it with
Keep Portainer, compare it with