# logforge vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | logforge | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #28 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 302 | 393 307 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 883 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for logforge.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [logforge](https://selfhost.directory/project/logforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/logforge.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/logforge-vs-openclaw