# logforge vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | logforge | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #28 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 302 | 20 540 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | V3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 47/100 for logforge, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for logforge.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; logforge needs more configuration.

MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [logforge](https://selfhost.directory/project/logforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/logforge.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/logforge-vs-mediamtx