logchimpvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logchimp | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Product Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 133 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.2 · 5 Sept 2026 | v2.18.27 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 53/100 for logchimp, so it is the safer default.
logchimp ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; logchimp needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
logchimp details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep logchimp, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with