logchimpvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| logchimp | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Product Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 133 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.2 · 5 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 53/100 for logchimp, so it is the safer default.
logchimp ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; logchimp needs more configuration.
logchimp details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep logchimp, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with