# logchimp vs MedusaJs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | logchimp | MedusaJs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Product Management | #1 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 1 133 | 36 990 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +550 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.2 · 5 Sept 2026 | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 53/100 for logchimp, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for logchimp.

If you want the quickest setup, logchimp is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.

MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+550 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [logchimp](https://selfhost.directory/project/logchimp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/logchimp.md)
- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/logchimp-vs-medusajs