# Locust vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Locust | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 28 246 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.47.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Locust scores 78/100 against 66/100 for Shinobi, so it is the safer default.

Locust ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, Locust is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

Locust is growing faster right now (+68 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Locust](https://selfhost.directory/project/locust) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/locust.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/locust-vs-shinobi