Roborock Local ServervsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Roborock Local Server | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 1 206 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
Roborock Local Server ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
Roborock Local Server details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with