Roborock Local ServervsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Roborock Local Server | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 204 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +833 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Roborock Local Server.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+833 stars in 30 days).
Roborock Local Server details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with