# Roborock Local Server vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Roborock Local Server | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 204 | 61 542 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +498 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.

Roborock Local Server ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Roborock Local Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/local-roborock-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/local-roborock-server.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/local-roborock-server-vs-pi-hole