Roborock Local ServervsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Roborock Local Server | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 205 | 28 968 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +455 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Roborock Local Server.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+455 stars in 30 days).
Roborock Local Server details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with