# Roborock Local Server vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Roborock Local Server | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 1 204 | 65 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +313 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Roborock Local Server.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Roborock Local Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/local-roborock-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/local-roborock-server.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/local-roborock-server-vs-nocodb