Roborock Local ServervsmotionEye
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Roborock Local Server | motionEye | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Smart Home | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 204 | 4 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.2.1 · 8 Oct 2026 | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
motionEye scores 65/100 against 54/100 for Roborock Local Server, so it is the safer default.
Roborock Local Server ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.
If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; Roborock Local Server needs more configuration.
motionEye is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Roborock Local Server details →motionEye details →
Swap a project
Keep Roborock Local Server, compare it with
Keep motionEye, compare it with