Local Deep ResearchvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 9 441 | 6 523 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.
Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, Local Deep Research is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).
Local Deep Research details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with