Local Deep ResearchvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 9 443 | 2 676 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Local Deep Research scores 74/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Local Deep Research needs more configuration.
Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).
Local Deep Research details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with