Local Deep Researchvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 441 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 29 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 24 for Local Deep Research.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Local Deep Research needs more configuration.
Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).
Local Deep Research details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with