# Local Deep Research vs Typesense

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Local Deep Research | Typesense |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 9 442 | 27 063 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +312 | +470 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 ✓ | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Typesense scores 79/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.

Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.

If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; Local Deep Research needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Local Deep Research](https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research.md)
- [Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense.md)

## Related comparisons

- [MeiliSearch vs Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/compare/meilisearch-vs-typesense)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/local-deep-research-vs-typesense