Local Deep ResearchvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Local Deep Research | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 9 442 | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +312 | +470 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 74/100 for Local Deep Research, so it is the safer default.
Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; Local Deep Research needs more configuration.
Local Deep Research details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep Local Deep Research, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with