# Local Deep Research vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Local Deep Research | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 9 439 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Local Deep Research scores 74/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Local Deep Research is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Local Deep Research](https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/local-deep-research.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/local-deep-research-vs-tube-archivist