LobuvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lobu | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #110 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 93 082 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +58 141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 |
| Latest release | lobu-v24.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 48/100 for Lobu, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Lobu.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Lobu needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).
Lobu details →OmniVoice-Studio details →