# llama.cpp vs youtube-dl-nas

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | llama.cpp | youtube-dl-nas |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 132 679 ✓ | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 224 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1462 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for youtube-dl-nas.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)
- [youtube-dl-nas](https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/llamacpp-vs-youtube-dl-nas